55
Views & Citations10
Likes & Shares
It is therefore necessary to change the models followed so far and start to implement practices based on social and environmental (Arrobas, 2020). Global development has given rise to growth in terms of technology, the media, and social networks incorporated in education, whose objective is to face this globalized environment and allow a greater interaction of the educational organization (Araujo & Ramos, 2014). In this perspective, education plays a fundamental role in the transmission of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors that allow young people to have a critical and informed participation in the face of local and global challenges (UNESCO, 2016). On the other hand, education also has the function of deconstructing the resistance to change, functioning as a gear that enables a dynamic relationship between all stakeholders (Korstanje & George 2020, 347) and it is one of UNESCO's top priorities toward sustainable development since students need to learn how to act for our planet (UNESCO). To accomplish sustainable development goals, we need to change the way we think. To achieve a more sustainable world, as described in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and address all sustainability issues, individuals need to become change makers (European Commission Directorate General of Education Youth Sport and Culture., 2021).
Given the relevance of the theme of sustainability and the fact that education plays a very important role in the development of new behaviors, there exists a necessity to understand the perceptions and behaviors of the students. Do they have the needed knowledge to transform the tourism industry?
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Over the years the awareness for a sustainable practice has grown as well as the government and community pressure over companies, encouraging them to make more conscious decisions when it comes to environmental responsibility (Swarbrooke, 1999). Despite the environmental damage caused by the economic development a part of the population still hasn’t adopted new behaviors maintaining a permissive attitude within social and legal restrictions (Middleton & Hawkins, 1998). By the end of 2019, the European Ecological Pact emerges to transform the European Union into an economy more efficient and competitive regarding the use of resources. To face the climatic change, there is a need to prepare the tourism industry to deal with the consequences, adopting measures that minimize the environmental impact, but at the same time make the community aware of the need to change behaviors, namely for environmental efficiency and carbon footprint reduction (Turismo de Portugal, 2020). The globalization process caused a need to communicate with diverse cultures, and education aims to face this globalized environment by facilitating this communication. It is urgent to educate for interculturality and citizenship (Araujo & Ramos, 2014). In 2016 the document "Education for Development Benchmark - Pre-School Education, Basic Education and Secondary Education" was approved to raise awareness and promote the right and duty of all people to participate in contributing to sustainable development. Education for development aims to contribute to the promotion of sustainable development through the implementation of public awareness strategies and educational activities (Cardoso; Pereira, 2016). The need to face global development challenges gave rise to the document Agenda 2030, approved by the United Nations. The 2030 agenda report defined 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be in force by 2030, it's divided into thematic areas education mentioned has one of the strategic axils, to promote a universal sustainable development of education worldwide (Relatório Voluntário Nacional, 2017). In Portugal, there are two types of education, regular and vocational. Regular education it’s a more general type of education, it teaches all the compulsory subjects for each course. These Scientific-Humanistic Courses are subdivided into four different areas, as stipulated by the Directorate-General for Education in Portugal (DGE): Science and technology, socioeconomic science, languages and humanities, and visual arts. Vocational training courses are also provided by the DGE, under the auspices of the National Agency for Qualification and Vocational Education (ANQEP). The International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED), (UNESCO,1997). defines vocational or technical education as teaching designed primarily to enable participants to acquire the practical skills, know-how, and understanding necessary to work in a particular field of profession or trade. These courses focus on a single area of study with a more practical component, better-preparing students who are sure of the path they want to follow, regardless of whether they want to continue it in Higher Education or not. Due to the need for education to address the growing challenges of sustainability, emerges the document “Education for citizenship-guidelines” (Cardoso; Pereira, 2016) which sets out the thematic areas to be worked on by schools within the scope of education for citizenship. In the 2018/2019 school year, Rule nº55/2018-National Strategy for Education for Citizenship, is implemented in Portugal. This rule regulates the process of curricular autonomy and flexibility in primary and secondary education and aims to train individuals as participatory citizens to exercise citizenship throughout life. In secondary education, there is an obligation to implement a reinforcement of the curricular component of citizenship and development through the creation of projects with students in various thematic areas. The thematic areas are divided into three groups and, in the first group, mandatory for all schooling cycles, the domain of sustainability and environmental education appears as an area to be worked on. In vocational education courses, in additionally to the discipline of citizenship and development, there is the discipline of integration area, which aims the transversely and meeting of knowledge from various disciplinary areas, to lead to the acquisition of knowledge for the development of competencies for insertion in the labor market (Vocational, 2005) . This discipline is divided by thematic areas being the sustainable development one of them. Even though sustainability is one of the themes to be addressed it’s not commendatory, the decision to choose this theme belongs to the schools and teachers. Contrary to what happens in higher education, there are no studies about sustainability in secondary education.
METHODOLOGY
Starting question and hypothesis
The need for education for sustainability is well recognized, as we can see from the literature mentioned above. Portugal, following the strategic axes for sustainable development, has been making some changes to the curricula, especially with the implementation of the discipline of citizenship and development with projects to be worked on within the scope of sustainability and the environment. However, there is still a predominance of environmental issues with little or no reference to the other pillars of sustainability (economic and social). Despite sustainability being an increasingly mentioned topic in the media and being a growing concern of governments, the curricula do not seem to show this concern. Of the studies found on education and sustainable tourism, all are aimed at higher education students, namely the studies: “Measuring tourism and environmental sciences students’ attitudes towards sustainable tourism” (Arrobas,2020). “What do tourism students know about sustainability and sustainable tourism? An exploratory study of Latin American students” (Camargo e Gretzel, 2017). Transformation for sustainability: The role of complexity in tourism students understanding of sustainable tourism” (Hales & Jennings, 2017) and “Will the future be greener? The Environmental Behavioral Intentions of University Tourism Students” (Pan, 2018). However, is it not also significant to assess the perceptions and attitudes of secondary school students (regular and vocational) on sustainable tourism, both as future consumers and as possible future professionals in the hotel and tourism industry? Are there different perceptions and attitudes between students in regular and vocational education? On the other hand, it is also important to analyze positive and negative attitudes to be able to model tourists' attitudes (Obradović, 2021). For this reason, this study aims to construct and validate a survey that could carry out an analysis of students’ perceptions and attitudes about sustainable tourism.
The Pilot Survey Construction
The original questionnaire was created based on four different authors (Table 1) and it was divided into eight dimensions (The concept of sustainability and sustainable tourism, environmental sustainability, social costs and benefits, economic costs and benefits, participation of local people, long-term planning, visitor satisfaction and a people-centered economy) in a total of 52 items. The survey used in this study was adapted by changing some items and adding others of greater interest to the target audience in question, it aimed to assess what students know and feel about issues related to sustainability, as well as the notion they have, of their competences and autonomy, to make decisions based on these same principles. Most of the questions were built according to a survey created by Choi & Sirakaya, (2005) on attitudes towards sustainable tourism (SUS-TAS), in the article “Measuring residents’ attitude toward sustainable tourism: Development of sustainable tourism attitude scale”, whose objective was to assess, through a scale, the residents' attitudes towards sustainable tourism. To access what students knew about sustainability and the sustainable tourism concept, and to create that dimension, the survey was based on the article “What do tourism students know about sustainability and sustainable tourism? An exploratory study of Latin American students by Camargo & Gretzel (2017). To develop the other dimensions, questionnaires from two other articles were used: "Students' perceptions and attitudes toward sustainable tourism development in Albania" by Dibra & Oelfke, (2013) and “University student’s perception on sustainable development: A case study from Turkey” by Tuncer, (2008). The questionnaire applied in this study consisted of 51 items divided into 8 sections, and the degree of agreement with phrases related to the 8 sections and items was measured. The sections were:
- The concept of sustainability and sustainable tourism
- Environmental sustainability
- Social costs and benefits
- Economic costs and benefits
- Participation of local inhabitants
- Long-term planning
- Visitor satisfaction
- People-centric economy
Table 1. Original Sustainable Tourism Survey.
Question |
Sustainability and sustainable tourism concept |
Author |
Q1_01 |
I know the concept of sustainability |
Camargo & Gretzel (2017) |
Q1_02 |
I can explain the concept of sustainable tourism |
|
Q1_03 |
I can identify the impacts of tourism |
|
Q1_04 |
I can list the principles of good sustainable tourism practices |
|
Q1_05 |
I feel that I have the necessary skills to practice sustainable tourism |
|
Q1_06 |
I know how to make decisions based on the principles of sustainable tourism |
|
Question |
Environmental sustainability |
Author |
Q2_01 |
The environment must be protected now and, in the future |
Choi & Sirakaya (2005) |
Q2_02 |
The diversity of nature must be valued and protected |
|
Q2_03 |
Tourism must protect the environment |
|
Q2_04 |
Tourism must develop in harm on with the natural and cultural environment |
|
Q2_05 |
Tourism should make efforts for nature and environment conservation |
|
Q2_06 |
The correct way to develop tourism involves the protection of animals and their habitats |
|
Q2_07 |
Tourism development must protect the principles of environmental ethics |
|
Q2_08 |
Tourism must improve the environment for future generations |
|
Question |
Social costs and benefits |
Author |
Q3_01 |
Tourists in my locality disturb my quality of life |
Choi & Sirakaya (2005) |
Q3_02 |
My quality of life has deteriorated due to tourism |
|
Q3_03 |
I am often irritated by tourism in my locality |
|
Q3_04 |
The recreational resources in my town (beaches, monuments, etc.) are overused by tourists |
|
Q3_05 |
My town is overcrowded due to tourist development |
|
Q3_06 |
I don't feel comfortable or welcome in local tour companies |
|
Q3_07 |
Tourism is growing too fast |
|
Q3_08 |
I believe the environmental quality has worsened due to tourism |
|
Q3_09 |
Tourism development provides a better offer of cultural and sports facilities |
Dibra & Oelfke (2013) |
Q3_10 |
Tourism makes it possible to protect cultural traditions |
|
Q3_11 |
Tourism development leads to an increase in crime |
|
Question |
Economic costs and benefits |
Author |
Q4_01 |
I believe that tourism contributes positively to my locality |
Choi & Sirakaya (2005) |
Q4_02 |
Tourism generates substantial revenue for city councils |
|
Q4_03 |
I believe tourism is good for the economy |
|
Q4_04 |
Tourism creates new markets for our local products |
|
Q4_05 |
Tourism diversifies the local economy |
|
Q4_06 |
Tourism benefits other companies in the locality |
|
Q4_07 |
Tourism provides new employment opportunities |
Dibra & Oelfke (2013) |
Q4_08 |
Tourism development causes price inflation in my locality |
|
Q4_09 |
Tourism stimulates investment |
|
Q4_10 |
Tourism generates seasonal and unstable jobs |
|
Q4_11 |
Environmental protection is more important than economic growth |
Tuncer G (2008) |
Question |
Long term planning |
Author |
Q6_01 |
The tourism industry must plan for the future |
Choi & Sirakaya (2005) |
Q6_02 |
I believe that effective tourism management requires an advanced planning strategy |
|
Q6_03 |
I believe that tourism development needs well-coordinated planning |
|
Q6_04 |
Tourism development plans must be continually improved |
|
Q6_05 |
I believe that we need a long-term vision when planning tourism development |
|
Question |
Participation of local people |
Author |
Q5_01 |
Decisions related to tourism must be taken by all stakeholders in the population |
Choi & Sirakaya (2005) |
Q5_02 |
For tourism development to be successful, decisions must be made with the participation of all local people. |
|
Q5_03 |
There is no problem if decisions do not involve all local people |
|
Q5_04 |
The tourism industry must meet the principles and values of residents |
|
Question |
Visitor satisfaction |
Author |
Q7_01 |
The tourism industry must ensure a quality tourist experience for all visitors |
Choi & Sirakaya (2005) |
Q7_02 |
Tourist companies must monitor visitor satisfaction |
|
Q7_03 |
It is the responsibility of tourist companies to meet the needs of visitors |
|
Question |
People-centric economy |
Author |
Q8_01 |
It should be mandatory that in the tourist industry, at least half of the consumption of goods and services takes place in the locality |
Choi & Sirakaya (2005) |
Q8_02 |
I believe that tourist companies should hire at least half of their employees in the locality |
|
Q8_03 |
The tourism industry must contribute to the improvement or increase of funds for the locality |
It was prepared in Microsoft Forms and released by a link sent by email to all schools in the West zone with secondary and vocational education. Later it was extended to other schools in other districts, namely Lisbon, Aveiro, and Santarém. A test phase was carried out with a vocational education class where 16 students were surveyed. At this stage, some terms were changed to make it easier for students to understand some concepts. 200 responses were collected, 10 of which were not counted for analysis as they did not contain all the necessary data. This study took place in two phases: first, an analysis was carried out on all students, regardless of the type of education. Then, a comparison was made between the two types of teaching, to assess whether there are differences between the two types of education.
RESULTS
Profile of the participants
Regarding the ages of the respondents, they are between 15 years and 24 years old, with the majority being between 16 years old (25.3%), 17 years old (35.8%) and 18 years old (18.4%). 48.9% attend vocational education and 51.1% attend regular education, with 32.1% in the 10th year (equivalent to the 1st year of vocational education), 41.1% in the 11th year (equivalent to the 2nd year of vocational education), and 26.8% in the 12th year (equivalent to the 3rd year of vocational education). Regarding vocational education courses, 22 courses were identified, with a higher incidence in the sports technician courses (14.7%) and the environmental and rural tourism courses (4.7%).
Construct Reliability
To assess if the study had reliability the survey was submitted to a reliability factor analysis. The first survey consisted of eight dimensions divided into 51 items, revealed good sampling adequacy for factor analysis (KMO test) and, although the variables were sufficiently correlated (Bartlett's < 0.0001), some items had correlations lower than 0.40, and 12 factors explained 67.63% of the total variance. According to Choi & Sirakaya, (2005) a used procedure to assess the quality of the items of a survey is to verify their scores and correlations, therefore all items with a factor load inferior to 0.40 and communality smaller than 0.50, were eliminated. After the elimination process, the KMO test measured 0.876 revealing that the sample was suited for analysis and the Bartlett test had a sig of 0.000, proving that the sample is homogeneous. The results now reveal that nine factors explained 69.66% of the total variance divided into 37 items. Therefore, the varimax rotation was applied to access the factor loading scores to re-design the dimensions for the survey. The ninth factor had higher loading values than other factors and, on that account, the survey was divided into 8 factors/dimensions (Figure 1). Table 2 displays the eigenvalues and factor loading from each item. To verify the reliability of the survey and determine its internal consistency, the test of Cronbach Alpha was applied (Table 3). The survey items were now divided according to the factor loading into the following dimensions: Factor 1: Sustainability and sustainable tourism concept (3 items; alpha 0.794), factor 2: environmental sustainability (8 items, alpha 0.918), factor 3: social costs and benefits (6 items, alpha 0.856), factor 4: cultural benefits (2 items, alpha 0.627), factor 5: economic costs and benefits (6 items, alpha 0.848), factor 6: long term planning and visitor satisfaction (7 items, alpha 0.901), factor 7: participation of local people (3 items, alpha (0.681) and factor 8: people-centric economy (2 items, alpha 0.684).
Figure 1. Factorial Elbow Graphic.
Table 2. Exploratory Factor Analysis.
Sustainable Tourism Survey |
Factor loading |
Communality |
Sustainability and sustainable tourism concept |
|
|
I can list the principles of good sustainable tourism practices |
0,732 |
0,644 |
I feel that I have the necessary skills to practice sustainable tourism |
0,809 |
0,791 |
I know how to make decisions based on the principles of sustainable tourism |
0,841 |
0,789 |
Environmental sustainability |
|
|
The environment must be protected now and, in the future |
0,748 |
0,733 |
The diversity of nature must be valued and protected |
0,786 |
0,758 |
Tourism must protect the environment |
0,762 |
0,682 |
Tourism must develop in harmony with the natural and cultural environment |
0,828 |
0,777 |
Tourism should make efforts for nature and environment conservation |
0,843 |
0,796 |
The correct way to develop tourism involves the protection of animals and their habitats |
0,667 |
0,636 |
Tourism development must protect the principles of environmental ethics |
0,760 |
0,689 |
Tourism must improve the environment for future generations |
0,729 |
0,658 |
Social costs and benefits |
|
|
Tourists in my locality disturb my quality of life |
0,794 |
0,645 |
My quality of life has deteriorated due to tourism |
0,817 |
0,776 |
I am often irritated by tourism in my locality |
0,832 |
0,786 |
The recreational resources in my town (beaches, monuments, etc.) are overused by tourists |
0,661 |
0,676 |
My town is overcrowded due to tourist development |
0,727 |
0,652 |
I don't feel comfortable or welcome in local tour companies |
0,730 |
0,573 |
Cultural benefits |
|
|
Tourism development provides a better offer of cultural and sports facilities |
0,669 |
0,618 |
Tourism makes it possible to protect cultural traditions |
0,748 |
0,670 |
Economic costs and benefits |
|
|
I believe that tourism contributes positively to my locality |
0,583 |
0,763 |
Tourism generates substantial revenue for city councils |
0,584 |
0,559 |
I believe tourism is good for the economy |
0,572 |
0,668 |
Tourism creates new markets for our local products |
0,635 |
0,629 |
Tourism diversifies the local economy |
0,716 |
0,764 |
Tourism benefits other companies in the locality |
0,694 |
0,683 |
Long-term planning | Visitor satisfaction |
|
|
I believe that effective tourism management requires an advanced planning strategy |
0,719 |
0,698 |
I believe that tourism development needs well-coordinated planning |
0,748 |
0,732 |
Tourism development plans must be continually improved |
0,727 |
0,702 |
I believe that we need a long-term vision when planning tourism development |
0,700 |
0,737 |
The tourism industry must ensure a quality tourist experience for all visitors |
0,643 |
0,639 |
Tourist companies must monitor visitor satisfaction |
0,758 |
0,746 |
It is the responsibility of tourist companies to meet the needs of visitors |
0,689 |
0,573 |
Participation of local people |
|
|
Decisions related to tourism must be taken by all stakeholders in the population |
0,793 |
0,760 |
For tourism development to be successful, decisions must be made with the participation of all local people. |
0,814 |
0,727 |
There is no problem if decisions do not involve all local people |
0,673 |
0,571 |
People-centric economy |
|
|
It should be mandatory that in the tourist industry, at least half of the consumption of goods and services takes place in the locality |
0,773 |
0,760 |
I believe that tourist companies should hire at least half of their employees in the locality |
0,767 |
0,718 |
Table 3. Cronbach’s Alphas per Dimension.
Factor |
Number of items |
Alpha |
Sustainability and sustainable tourism concept |
3 |
0,794 |
Environmental sustainability |
8 |
0,918 |
Social costs and benefits |
6 |
0,856 |
Cultural benefits |
2 |
0,627 |
Economic costs and benefits |
6 |
0,848 |
Long-term planning | Visitor satisfaction |
7 |
0,901 |
Participation of local people |
3 |
0,681 |
People-centric economy |
2 |
0,684 |
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
The main objective of this study was to create and validate a questionnaire that allowed us to assess the perception and attitudes of secondary school students about sustainable tourism, considering the obligation of secondary schools to implement the discipline of citizenship and development. The literature review involved research on the theme of sustainability and sustainable tourism as well as on the role of education for sustainability and the existing documents to train schools to transmit values and knowledge on this topic. Furthermore, the survey construction went through different phases the first being a literature review based on tourism researchers that would allow the creation of different dimensions and items of the questionnaire. The original survey was divided into 8 dimensions with 51 items in total. Therefore, the survey was first tested in a 16-student group to verify the need to change some terms so that it could be well understood. After some changes in some terms, the survey was applied, by Microsoft Forms, in schools in the western zone of Portugal, and later it was extended to other districts. A total of 200 responses were obtained. 10 of the responses were discarded due to insufficient data. The data collected was analyzed using SPSS, version 28 software. To verify the reliability of the survey a reliability factor analysis was carried out and the results indicated that some items had low correlations and were discarded. The varimax rotation was applied to verify the factor loading of each item so that the survey dimensions could be verified. The results showed that the dimensions needed some adjustments, although maintaining the 8 dimensions, now divided into 37 items. After the corrected item correlation, Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the reliability of the survey, with high accepted alpha results.
This research revealed that the survey can be applied to assess the perceptions and attitudes of students about sustainability and sustainable tourism. It will allow teachers of different disciplines, and those responsible for implementing projects in citizenship, to rethink the projects they implement with their students, to be able to work on the theme of sustainability, based on its three principles, economic, social, and environmental rather than just focusing on environmental issues. The references for citizenship education, and the suggestions for topics to work on, can be reassessed and adapted to work with more sustainability-related topics that include the three dimensions of sustainability. As a recommendation for future investigations, we suggest the application of the constructed and validated questionnaire, exploring which variables lead to more sustainable behaviors. In addition, to verify which external factors contribute to the students' perception and attitudes, and which is the best way to establish sustainable behaviors.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data directly supporting the study results can be found on the website Mendeley data V1. doi 10.17632/789m7fd536.1, https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/789m7fd536/1.
DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.- ARAUJO., Domira Fernandes DE., RAMOS., Maria Da Conceição Pereira Desafios. (2014). interculturais e educacionais para um turismo sustentável Revista Cenário, 2(3), 89-105.
- ARROBAS, Fernando. (2020). Measuring tourism and environmental sciences students’ attitudes towards sustainable tourism. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism Education, 27: 1-12.
- CAMARGO, Blanca A., GRETZEL. (2017). Ulrike What do tourism students know about sustainability and sustainable tourism an exploratory study of Latin American students. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 17(2), 101-117.
- CARDOSO., PEREIRA, J., Neves L. Referencial de Educação para o Desenvolvimento.
- CHOI, Hwan Suk Chris., Ercan Sirakaya. (2005) Measuring residents’ attitude toward sustainable tourism Development of sustainable tourism attitude scale. Journal of Travel Research, 4, 380-394.
- DIBRA, Mirjam., OELFKE Ted. (2013). Students perceptions and attitudes toward sustainable tourism development in Albania. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(10), 706-714.
- EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EDUCATION YOUTH SPORT AND CULTURE. Education for environmental sustainability policies and approaches in European Union member states. Final Report.
- HALES, Rob., JENNINGS Gayle. (2016). Transformation for sustainability. The role of complexity in tourism students understanding of sustainable tourism. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 21, 185-194.
- KORSTANJE, GEORGE, Maximiliano E Korstanje., Babu., P. Education as a Strategy to Tackle for Overtourism and Inclusive Sustainability in the Twenty-First Century.
- MIDDLETON., Victor., HAWKINS Rebecca., Sanja. (2021). Sustainable Tourism: A Marketing Perspective OBRADOVIĆ Assessment of residents’ attitudes toward sustainable tourism development A case study of Bačko Podunavlje Biosphere Reserve Serbia. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 35.
- PAN, Su Lan. (2018). Will the future be greener the environmental behavioral intentions of university tourism students? Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(3), 1-17.
- POWER, Nicola, BEATTIE, Geoffrey, MCGUIRE Laura. (2017). Mapping our underlying cognitions and emotions about good environmental behavior: Why we fail to act despite the best of intentions. Semiotica. pp: 193-224.
- Swarbrooke, J. (1999). RELATÓRIO VOLUNTÁRIO NACIONAL Agenda Em Ministério dos Negócios Estrangeiros, Sustainable Tourism Management.
- TUNCER, G. University student’s perception on sustainable development A case study from Turkey. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 17(3), 212-226.
- TURISMO DE PORTUGAL Plano Turismo Sustentável (2020). pp: 20-23.
- UNESCO (2016). Unpacking Sustainable Development Goal Education United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
- UNESCO Education for sustainable development A Roadmap.
- WEAVER, David, BUCKLEY, Ralf, C. (2005). VOCACIONAL, Direcção-Geral De Formação, Àrea de Integração Sustainable Tourism Theory and Practice.