606
Views & Citations10
Likes & Shares
ANNOTATION
The article discusses the availability of natural
resources and their use in the Northern Ladoga region. The necessity for a
comparative regional approach to the development of regional environmental
management programs is argued. The analysis of geographical conditions
determining the regional recreational potential has been carried out. Several
options of effective use of tourist and recreational resources of the region
are submitted. The need for further interdisciplinary research on projects to
optimize regional environmental management is discussed.
Keywords: Effective Nature Management, Northern Ladoga Area, Ecological Tourism,
Specially Protected Natural Areas (SPNA).
INTRODUCTION
In
recent years, the socio-economic importance of tourism as a factor of
sustainable economic development of countries and regions of the world has been
rapidly increasing. The relevance of tourist and recreational activities
development in Russia has been emphasized by the government policy aimed at the
evolvement of recreation and tourism. In particular, the “Concept of the SPNAs
of Federal importance development system for the period up to 2020” was
adopted, the Federal target program “Development of domestic and inbound
tourism in the Russian Federation” (2011-2018) was implemented and the
“Strategy of development and national security of the Arctic zone of the
Russian Federation for the period up to 2020”, providing for the development of
Arctic tourism, was approved.
Nevertheless, these programs,
being of a framework nature, require scientific grounding.
The emergence of these programs
and their implementation show the importance of tourism in the life of Russian
society recognized by the state. However, it is much more important to develop
regional programs for the development of tourism, especially for Russia which
has a vast and diverse territory. It is at the regional level that specific
problems impeding tourism development arise, and, in turn, there are
opportunities to effectively address these issues. Therefore, it is important
to consider and analyze the experience of regional tourism development.
The Northern and North-Western
regions of Russia play a particularly important part in the country’s economic
development. Currently, these are mainly raw materials areas focused on the
development of extractive industries (oil and gas, mining, forestry), which are
bound to cause destruction and pollution of natural environment, as well as
degradation of natural landscapes. Therefore, an important strategic objective
of the development is preservation of both natural landscapes and historical
and cultural landscapes, formed over many centuries along the ancient waterways
[3].
A
particular part in the system of economic development of the region is given to
a tourist and recreational sphere, which, unlike many other forms of
environmental management, does not extract the resources but contributes to
their preservation and development.
The
literature review shows that a significant portion of publications on this
topic can be divided into the following groups: textbooks on environmental
management and environmental Economics (Bobylev & Khodzhaev, 2003;
Lukyanchikov & Potravny, 2012), specialized publications showing the
effectiveness of individual types of land use (Development management, 2008)
and research works attempting to analyze and identify the most effective forms
of natural resources use (Krasovskaya, 2008). The latter are of the greatest
interest, but they are the rarest. Moreover, at the regional level, such works
are almost non-existent.
Therefore,
the purpose of the study consists in determining the role of tourism and
recreation based on nature-cum-culture potential of the region and providing
recommendations for its streamlining.
To
achieve that, it is necessary to solve the following issues: to characterize
the specifics of natural conditions and cultural characteristics, to highlight
the main tourist attractions, and to demonstrate examples of the effective use
of the recreational potential in the region worth disseminating.
The
area of the considered region is located in the North of lake Ladoga and makes
part of the drainage basin of the Baltic Sea. Administratively, it belongs to
the Republic of Karelia and partly occupies some terrain in the North of the
Leningrad region (Priozersky district).
Here
lies a boundary between two major physical and geographical countries of
Fennoscandia and the Russian plain, natural subzones of the middle and southern
taiga, as well as Ladoga, the largest lake in Europe, with its unique
landscapes of skerries.
In the
Priladozhje, Ladoga area, cultural heritage of different peoples, such as
Karelians, Finns and Russians, is well preserved. In the vast forests of modern
Finland and the Republic of Karelia, they used to get furs which were later
transported by waterways to the territory of Ancient Russia and further along
the path “from the Varangians to the Greeks” [7].
Logging
can be attributed to modern developed forms of nature management. At that, the
most conflicting form of nature management is mining. Granite quarrying is
carried out mainly by means of explosions, causing negative environmental
impacts, such as seismic waves, dust emissions, etc. Also, in recent years,
mass suburban construction carried out within both functioning and abandoned
settlements has become another common form of nature management. Suburban
development or country house construction reduces a possibility of developing
socially important recreation zones and tourism in the region as the land valuable
for the development of tourism gets lost.
A high
degree of terrain mosaic, generated by both natural and human-induced factors,
results in a high aesthetic quality of the landscapes. Major tourist
attractions of the region are natural landscapes of the lake Ladoga area,
including the archipelago of Ladoga skerries; architectural, historical,
cultural and archaeological monuments, including a natural and cultural complex
of the Valaam monastery; museums; a possibility to use diverse natural objects
for practicing sports tourism, such as the rapids of the Tokhmayoki, Janisjoki,
Kulismayoki, Kirjinyoki rivers; and objects of scientific and educational
tourism, such as the Ruskeala mountain park.
The
rugged terrain of the territory and numerous attractions contribute to the
development of the following types of tourism: ecological, water sports,
cultural, historical and pilgrimage.
The
territory of Northern Ladoga area concentrates more than half a million people
a year [6].
Specially
protected natural territories (SPNT) of the North-Western Ladoga region are
important not only as a way of preserving selga and hollow type, but also as a
depository of unique skerry landscapes in the region. Also, they protect the
ecosystems of Europe's largest water systems including Lake Onega, lake Ladoga,
the Svir River, the Neva River, the Vuoksa river and part of the Finnish Gulf
of the Baltic Sea [2]. They can be considered unified, in regards to the
preservation of migratory sites of birds following the Belomoro-Baltijsky
migration route.
The
most significant specially protected natural area (SPNA) is the “Ladoga
Skerries” National Park created on the order issued in December 2017. A great
recreational value of the territory, as well as a high anthropogenic impact on
it exercised by tourists, summer residents, local residents, timber producers
and mining companies had necessitated the creation of this Park.
The
area of the Northern Vuoksa district is most widely used by St. Petersburg
residents for vacation and holidays. This factor calls for fundamental work in
view of assessing an anthropogenic impact on the area. That is why a
representative group of small business managers from Melnikovsky settlement,
Priozersk district of Leningrad region, together with scientists of the
Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, initiated a project
aimed at creating the National Park “North Vuoksa.”
One of
the most visited attractions in the region, not associated with the system of
protected areas, is the mountain Park “Ruskeala” - a rare example of a new
tourist object in the modern history of Russia. This all-season facility, the
number of visits to which exceeds 300 thousand people a year, is
once-well-equipped but now abandoned tunnels for marble extraction. Currently,
it is evolving into a kind of center for tourism development and tourist
infrastructure in the Sortavala district of the Republic of Karelia. One of the
reasons accounting for success of this project lies in an integrated and phased
development of the territory carried out in close cooperation with scientists
and environmental organizations.
Also,
there are interesting projects for the development of the territories
neighboring on the projected national Park “Ladoga Skerries”. Thus, the “Center
for environmental initiatives” ‘Nevo-Ekovil’ (Sortavala), comes up with a
multifunctional project to create “Ladoga-1”, a sustainable development area,
on the basis of the eponymous eco-settlement.
The
following project objectives are under consideration:
- Creating a
model of a new quality of life;
- Formation of
new opportunities for socio-economic development on the basis of a new complex
cultural, ecological and industrial structure;
- Reduction of
rural poverty;
-
Implementation of self-government mechanisms in rural areas.
A
comprehensive solution to regional problems is associated with the
implementation of interrelated and mutually supporting projects, such as:
-
“Zemnomorje”, center of ecological tourism;
- “Materinsky
Sad”, ecological and biological science and education project;
- “Derevnja
Masterov”, manufacturing cultural and educational center.
As part
of its operations, the Center of ecological tourism offers a whole range of
different ecotourism products, such as educational, eventful, sportive,
spiritual and domestic ones.
According
to the authors of the project, ecological tourism is bound to stimulate the
development of the construction sector, small-scale agricultural production,
and handicrafts, social, scientific, environmental and cultural projects. Its
attractiveness for tourists will permit not only selling the products but also
carrying out diverse eco-educational activities.
It is
obvious that within the space of an article it is impossible to consider all
aspects and ways of optimization of tourist nature use of the region.
Therefore, further research is needed. The most important objectives of the
article could include the need for discussing the problems of effective use of
natural resources and conflict resolution of regional types of environmental
management; the development of criteria for assessing the optimization of
recreational environmental management. All these studies can be carried out
only by involving specialists from various fields of activities united by one
common goal, i.e., optimization of environmental management, aimed at
sustainable development of the region.
Bobylev,
S.N. & Khodjaev, A.Sh. (2003). Economics of nature management. Textbook. M,
567.
Kovalev,
D.N. & Noskov, G.A. (2012). The concept of formation of regional system of
specially protected natural territories (based on St. Petersburg and Leningrad
region), “Biosphere”. Interdisciplinary
Scientific and Applied Journal, 4(4), 65-100.
Korostelev,
E.M., Zelutkina, L.O. & Sevastyanov, D.V. (2014). Old portages as unique
monuments of northern development. Priroda,
4(1184), 29-37.
Krasovskaya,
T.M. (2008). Nature use of the North of Russia. M, 288.
Lukyanchikov,
N.N. & Potravny, I.M. (2012) Economics and organization of nature
management. Textbook for University students, M, 687.
Management
of Tourism Development in the Region (2008). Experience in the implementation
strategy of the Republic of Karelia/Institute of Economics of Karelian research
center, Russian Academy of Sciences. Ed. by Savelyeva, J.V. & Tolstoguzov,
O.V. - Petrozavodsk.
Sevastyanov,
D.V., Korostelev, E.M., Mulyava, O.D., Shitova, L.F., Colpaert, A. &
Lahteenmaki, M. (2013) Border recreation nature management in the North-Western
region of Russia as a factor of sustainable territorial development. Bulletin
of St. Petersburg University. Series 7. Geology. Geography, 2, 119-128.