|Devon Myers*, Jacob J Triplet, Aimee K LaRiccia, Daniel Degenova, David B Johnson and Benjamin C Taylor|
|Corresponding Author: Devon Myers, DO, Ohio Health Doctors Hospital, Orthopedic Residency Program, 5100 West Broad Street Columbus, OH 43228, USA|
|Received: May 24, 2019; Accepted: June 10, 2019; Published: January 05, 2020;|
|Citation: Myers D, Triplet JJ, LaRiccia AK, Degenova D, Johnson DB, et al. (2020) Role of Vitamin D Deficiency in Fracture Healing. J Rheumatol Res, 2(1): 64-69.|
|Copyrights: ©2020 Myers D, Triplet JJ, LaRiccia AK, Degenova D, Johnson DB, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.|
Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent throughout the world and has been long suspected to play a role in fracture healing. The goals of this study were to evaluate rates of union, time to union and vitamin D treatment patterns in adult fracture patients. A retrospective review was performed by evaluating charts and radiographs of patients who underwent fracture fixation. Vitamin D levels were recorded postoperatively and correlated with fracture union rate and time to union. The rate of vitamin D supplementation was also reviewed. Results showed an 11% decrease in fracture union rate in patients with 25(OH) vitamin D levels < 20 mg/ml compared with levels >20 mg/ml; 81% and 92%, respectively (p=0.07). Vitamin D levels also did not significantly impact time to union. Despite low vitamin D in 58% of included patients, only 13% were discharged with a vitamin D prescription. These results suggest there is room for improvement with regards to assessing and treating deficiency in fracture patients. While an 11% decrease was noted in fracture union with Vitamin D deficiency, our report does not provide statistically significant data to make overarching conclusions about the role of vitamin D in fracture healing or time to union following fixation. However, it was noted that Vitamin D supplementation following fracture fixation may be inappropriately deficient. Further studies are needed to define the best cutoff for treatment and to establish the mechanisms by which vitamin D influences bony healing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective chart review of our institution’s repository for orthopedic trauma patients treated for fracture by the senior surgeon author between June 2012 and December 2014 was performed. Institutional Review Board approval was granted prior to initiation of this study.
The final cohort consisted of 202 patients with 118 suffering multiple fractures which were individually evaluated. The average vitamin D level was 20 mg/ml (range, 4-78 mg/ml). Vitamin D and calcium levels are reported in Table 2. A total of 84 patients had vitamin D levels >20 ng/ml with an average of 28 ng/ml, (range, 21-78 ng/ml). Serum calcium averaged 8.7 and 8.6 in the vitamin D ≤ 20 ng/ml and >20 ng/ml groups, respectively. Rate of union for vitamin D levels >20 ng/ml was 92%, while only 81% in the group with vitamin D<20 ng/ml (p=0.07). Time to union was 7.3 months with vitamin D<20 ng/ml and 8.5 months with vitamin D>20 ng/ml (p=0.07) (Table 3). Despite a postoperative vitamin D level ≤ 20 ng/ml in 118 patients, only 15 (13%) patients were discharged with vitamin D supplementation. Among the 202 patients, bisphosphonates were not used in any patient and teriperatide was given in 2 (1%) patients postoperatively.
Vitamin D levels significantly influence the body’s calcium balance and affect bony mineralization . There is growing interest in the relationship of fracture union and vitamin D levels. Despite this interest, recommendations for therapeutic intervention following fracture fixation have not been established. To our knowledge, no study has investigated fracture union and the time to union based on the generally recommended cutoff of vitamin D levels. In patients with vitamin D levels <20 ng/ml an 11% decrease was noted in union rates without reaching statistical significance. Interestingly, faster union was noted in vitamin D-deficient patients, however, again without statistical significance. Several factors have been shown to influence vitamin D level. Such reported factors include smoking, seasonal changes, and fracture [11,13,20]. Briggs et al. reported a decrease in serum 1,25(OH)2D concentrations over a 6 week period following long bone fracture. Interestingly, they noted an increase in calcium concentration without a corresponding increase in phosphate or parathyroid hormone . Additionally, Brinker et al reported that 68% of patients with a fracture nonunion were found to have a previously undiagnosed vitamin D deficiency ; other studies have validated this conclusion . Thus, many studies have now recommended vitamin D supplementation with at least 800 IU/day in fracture patients, as supplementation has little toxicity and has an association with calcium metabolism and a link to bone healing [14,19,21]. Despite a 58% prevalence of patients with low vitamin D levels, only 13% of patients in our study were discharged home with vitamin D prescription. The role of bisphosphonate following fracture fixation remains unknown. However, its use in fracture nonunion has been reported . Although over half of the patients were deemed to be vitamin D deficient, no patient was treated with bisphosphonates postoperatively. Additionally, the effect of using teriparatide, an rDNA injection, following fracture fixation in vitamin D deficient patients remains unknown. While utility has been suggested, it is impossible to draw any conclusions from this study as none of the vitamin D deficient patients who underwent fracture fixation were being treated with bisphosphonates or teriparatide. The primary objective of this investigation was post-surgical fracture union as it relates to vitamin D levels. Although not statistically significant, we demonstrate an 11% lower overall union rate amongst patients with low vitamin D levels. These results align with prior studies, which have identified a relationship between fracture healing and vitamin D levels [18,19,22,23]. We hypothesize that with a more robust sample size, this relationship may lead to statistical significance. However, studies have disputed this relationship. Despite a small sample size, Boszczyk et al.  compared diaphyseal non-unions to normally healing fractures in 35 patients and found no difference in the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency. Despite several publications suggesting an association between vitamin D levels and fracture union, no established guidelines exist for a reasonable and appropriate cutoff level for vitamin D therapeutic intervention. While several studies have used 20 ng/ml or less as a marker [16,17], the Institute of Medicine reported cutoffs of <30 ng/ml, arguing that at >50 ng/ml, levels are more optimal with regards to fracture patients . The most sensitive and specific level has still not been identified with regards to fracture healing and merits further research. While the presence of fracture union, as it relates to vitamin D levels have been researched, the influence of such levels on time to union is unknown. In our study, vitamin D levels did not statistically influence time to union. Unexpectedly, we noted a faster time to union in vitamin D-deficient patients despite an overall lower union rate. This is in contrast to other studies, which have demonstrated a higher delayed union rate amongst vitamin D deficient patients . The high incidence of polytrauma in our cohort and its effect on time to union results is unknown. It has been suggested that normalization of vitamin D levels following supplementation may reduce the incidence of delayed union . Thus, it stands to reason that appropriate supplementation at the time of discharge may improve the time to union. While this was not investigated in our report, only 13% of vitamin D-deficient patients were discharged with a prescription for vitamin D. There are several limitations to this study. First, poor patient follow up may have influenced the time to union. As evident in several large trauma centers, patient follow up compliance is often challenging. Thus, the actual time to union may be falsely inflated secondary to this. This study cannot neither fully support nor oppose formerly held opinions that vitamin D is important for fracture healing and union rates given the fact that our conclusions did not reach statistical significance. Secondly, a cutoff of 20 ng/ml or less was used in this study to provide consistency with the current body of literature [16,17]. However, a different cutoff value may have influenced our findings. Further studies are needed to better establish appropriate cutoffs and subsequently examine the success of treatment methods related to inadequate vitamin D levels. Finally, the authors acknowledge that fracture healing is affected by the other variables in including fracture type, diabetes, steroid use, smoking and alcohol consumption. While these must be considered, the goal of this study was to evaluate the independent role of vitamin D in fracture healing. Subsequent studies should be performed to evaluate the effects of the aforementioned variables.
While an 11% decrease was noted in fracture union with Vitamin D deficiency, our report does not provide statistically significant data to make overarching conclusions about the influencing role of vitamin D in fracture healing or time to union following fixation. However, it was noted that Vitamin D supplementation following fracture fixation may be inappropriately deficient. Further studies establishing the appropriate cut-off value for therapeutic intervention are needed.
1. Basit S (2013) Vitamin D in health and disease: A literature review. Br J Biomed Sci 70: 161-172.
2. Bee CR, Sheerin DV, Wuest TK, Fitzpatrick DC (2013) Serum vitamin D levels in orthopaedic trauma patients living in the north-western United States. J Orthop Trauma 27: 103-106.
3. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Dietrich T, Dawson-Hughes B, et al. (2006) Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 84: 18-28.
4. Boszczyk AM, Zakrzewski P, Pomianowsk S (2013) Vitamin D concentration in patients with normal and impaired bone union. Pol Orthop Traumatol 78: 1-3.
5. Briggs AD, Kuan V, Greiller CL, Maclaughlin BD, Ramachandran M, et al. (2013). Longitudinal study of vitamin D metabolites after long bone fracture. J Bone Miner Res 28: 1301-1307.
6. Brinker MR, O'Connor DP, Monla YT, Earthman TP (2007) Metabolic and endocrine abnormalities in patients with non-unions. J Orthop Trauma 21: 557-570.
7. Brumbaugh PF, Speer DP, Pitt MJ (1982) 1 alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 a metabolite of vitamin D that promotes bone repair. Am J Pathol 106: 171-179.
8. Burckhardt P (2012) Calcium and Vitamin D in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis: The actual dilemma. Ther Umsch 69: 153-161.
9. Cherian VM, Gouse M, Alber S, Jayasankar V (2015) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients presenting with an orthopedic trauma at a tertiary centre in South India - Implications and Protocols for replacement therapy. Malays Orthop J 9: 21-25.
10. Cranney A, Horsley T, O'Donnell S, Weiler H, Puil, et al. (2007) Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D in relation to bone health. Evid Rep Technol Assess 158: 1-235.
11. Fentaw Y, Woldie H, Mekonnen S, Tsegaye AT (2017) Change in serum level of vitamin D and associated factors at early phase of bone healing among fractured adult patients at University of Gondar teaching hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: A prospective follow up study. Nutr J 16: 54.
12. Gennari C (2001) Calcium and vitamin D nutrition and bone disease of the elderly. Public Health Nutr 4: 547-559.
13. Gorter EA, Hamdy NA, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Schipper IB (2014) The role of vitamin D in human fracture healing: A systematic review of the literature. Bone 64: 288-297.
14. Gorter EA, Krijnen P, Schipper IB (2016) Vitamin D deficiency in adult fracture patients: Prevalence and risk factors. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42: 369-378.
15. Gorter EA, Krijnen P, Schipper IB (2017) Vitamin D status and adult fracture healing. J Clin Orthop Trauma 8: 34-37.
16. Gurlek A, Pittelkow MR, Kumar R (2002) Modulation of growth factor/cytokine synthesis and signaling by 1-alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3): Implications in cell growth and differentiation. Endocr Rev 23: 763-786.
17. Holick MF (2007) Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 357: 266-281.
18. Ito M, Azuma Y, Ohta T, Komoriya K (2000) Effects of ultrasound and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on growth factor secretion in co-cultures of osteoblasts and endothelial cells. Ultrasound Med Biol 26: 161-166.
19. Lindholm TS, Hackman R, Lindholm RV, Kinnunen P (1972) Fracture callus and mast cells in rats with calcium and vitamin D deficiency. Acta Orthop Scand 43: 221-233.
20. Lips P (2006) Vitamin D physiology. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 92: 4-8.
21. Office of the Surgeon General (US) (2004) Bone health and osteoporosis: A report of the surgeon general. Rockville (MD).
22. Ross AC, Taylor CL, Yaktine AL, Del Valle HB (2011) Dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Institute of Medicine Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium.
23. Schindeler A, McDonald MM, Bokko P, Little DG (2008) Bone remodeling during fracture repair: The cellular picture. Semin Cell Dev Biol 19: 459-466.
24. Van Demark RE 3rd, Allard B, Van Demark RE Jr. (2010) Non-union of a distal tibial stress fracture associated with vitamin D deficiency: A case report. S D Med 63: 87-91, 93.
25. van den Bergh J, van Geel T, Geusens P (2010) Should the vitamin D level be determined for all fracture patients? Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 154: A1758.
- Journal of Oral Health and Dentistry(ISSN:2638-499X)
- Journal of Ageing and Restorative Medicine(ISSN:2637-7403)
- Journal of Blood Transfusions and Diseases(ISSN:2641-4023)
- Journal of Otolaryngology and Neurotology Research(ISSN:2641-6956)
- International Journal of Medical and Clinical Imaging(ISSN:2573-1084)
- Advance Research on Endocrinology and Metabolism (ISSN: 2689-8209)
- International Journal of Diabetes (ISSN: 2644-3031)