Leonard Ifeanyi Amaefule* |
Corresponding Author: Leonard Ifeanyi Amaefule, Department of Accountancy, Imo State University Owerri, Nigeria |
Revised: 21 September 2020; |
Share : |
637
Views & Citations
Until 2007, Nigeria did not
have any specific regulation on public procurements; as such, mis-procurements
and misappropriations were the order of the day, leaving a negative effect on
the economic growth of the nation. This led to the enactment of the 2007 Public
Procurement Act (PPA). Subsequently, a great deal of positive difference was
expected in government’s procurement of goods and services including economic
and social community services, against the backdrop of their resultant effect
on the nation’s economic development index. But is this expectation supported
by any cogent empirical evidence? This study therefore evaluates the effect of
federal government’s capital procurement in the area of economic and social
community services on the real gross domestic product (RGDP) of Nigeria during
the Pre and Post 2007 PPA. Data were sourced from the Central Bank of Nigeria
Statistical Bulletin for the Pre-Procurement Act era (1997-2007) and Post
Procurement Act era (2008-2018). Results of the Ordinary Least Square
regression analysis conducted revealed that during the Pre-Procurement Act era,
economic services did not show any significant effect on RGDP while social
community services indicated a significant positive influence on RGDP. However,
during the post PPA era, neither Economic services nor Social Community
Services indicated any significant effect on the nation’s RGDP. It is therefore
inferred that mere change in the legal structure (framework) guiding public
procurement in Nigeria does not automatically translate to better procurement
procedures and improved economic fortune of the nation rather other factors
such as the capacity of procurement officers and transparent conduct of
procurement activities may be the key drivers of efficient government’s
procurement practices. The study therefore recommends that adequate capacity
building of government officials and stiffer punishment for misconduct in
procurement matters should be given ultimate attention by the government.
Keywords: Public
Procurement Act, Economic Services, Social Services, Real Gross Domestic
Product.