502
Views & Citations
Amongst the different aspects
requiring regulation is the field of taxation, not only due to its repercussion
and complexity, but also because of the unwanted consequences of applying the
tax regulations of different legal systems to the same taxable events or
activities. These undesirable consequences may arise for both taxpayers, who
might be forced to pay tax twice on the same earnings, and for States, which
may see their tax collection expectations negatively affected.
Following a number of attempts
by different international bodies to resolve the issue, the Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) unveiled an Action Plan in 2013 to
tackle the problems associated with tax base erosion and profit shifting
(BEPS). This was carried out in the main by multinational companies, which were
taking advantage of these very shortcomings in bilateral treaties and of the
differences between national tax systems to avoid or reduce paying their taxes.
Implementing one of the actions contemplated in said plan, 2016 saw the
creation of the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related
Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI).
One of the mechanisms
contemplated in the MLI is the implementation of international arbitration in
cases in which mutual agreement procedures do not come to successful fruition.
For it to be able to effectively accomplish its purpose, this arbitration must
be mandatory and binding, and initiated at the request of the taxpayer. Despite
certain States’ reticence to give up some of their sovereignty and be bound by
the resolutions of bodies outside of their jurisdictions, the losses they are
suffering in their tax income are forcing them to adopt new measures at an
international level, as global problems can only be resolved effectively with
multilateral solutions. The European Union (EU) approved in 2017 a Directive
obliging Member States to introduce systems that must include binding
arbitration in their legislation systems for resolving tax disputes and
providing effective solutions outside of the national courts.
Keywords: Tax, Taxpayer,
Arbitration, Proceeding, Resolution, International, EU.