859Views & Citations
Background: NIPAH virus (NiV) is a zoonotic virus (it is transmitted from animal to human) through contaminated food or directly between people. The case fatality rate is estimated at 40% to 75%. An outbreak of NIPAH infection is occurred in Kerala in May 2018 resulting in 17 deaths.
Results: Majority 17(56%) of BPT students had moderate knowledge, remaining 13(44%) of BPT Students had inadequate knowledge and no one scored adequate knowledge. There was no significant association between level of knowledge and their selected demographic variables.
Conclusions: The study revealed that the students had moderate and inadequate knowledge, so there is a need of teaching programme to improve their knowledge.
Keywords: Knowledge, NIPAH, BPT students
NIPAH virus is a recently emerged deadly paramyxovirus. It was identified as the etiologic agent of an outbreak of severe encephalitis in people with close contact exposure to pigs. Until the recent outbreak in Kerala (2018), knowledge of human infection with NIPAH virus was limited to Malaysia, Singapore and Bangladesh . NIPAH outbreak in Malaysia altered global public health community to the severe pathogenic potential and wide spread distribution of these unique paramyxoviruses. NIPAH was initially isolated and identified in 1999 during an outbreak of encephalitis and respiratory illness among pig farmers and people with close contact with pigs in Malaysia and Singapore..
Mainly the cause of NIPAH is NIPAH virus or after directed contact with infected bats, infected pigs. It is associated with ingestion of contaminated Date palm sap and human to human transmission. The incubation period of NIPAH infection varies from 4-14 days.
Clinical features range from asymptomatic infection to acute respiratory tract infection and fatal encephalitis. The case fatality rate is 40-70%. The signs and symptoms of NIPAH begin with fever and headache and followed by inflammation of brain(encephalitis), drowsiness and disorientation characterized by mental confusion and dizziness. About half of the cause also experiences respiratory symptoms. These signs and symptoms can progress to coma within 24-48 h. Other symptoms are myalgia, sore throat, vomiting, dizziness etc. older patients, especially those supportive cares and to having diabetes mellitus and those with severe brain-stem involvement carried a poorer prognosis .
The natural host for NIPAH virus is fruit bats belonging to family Pteropodidae and pigs. The treatment is limited to viruses currently there is no vaccine available against NIPAH virus. During the first recognize outbreak in Malaysia, which also affected Singapore . Most human infections resulted supportive care and to prevent hospital acquired infections.
The drug Ribavirin has been shown to be effective against the
from direct contact with sick pigs or their contaminated tissues. Transmission is thought to have occurred via unprotected exposure to secretions from the pigs. In subsequent outbreaks in Bangladesh and India, consumption of fruits or fruit products (such as raw date palm juice) contaminated with urine or saliva from infected fruit bats was the most likely source of infection. .
The first case occurred in Calicut District, Northern Kerala, and the infection spread to the neighboring districts. The health ministry and health professionals had done outstanding work to control the disease. The Government has initiated a multi-disciplinary team approach to control this situation. A multi-disciplinary central team from the national control for disease sent to Kerala to investigate and respond.
The descriptive design is adopted the investigator conducted the study at Institute of Paramedical Science, Kannur Medical College among BPT students. The study samples were selected using nonprobability convenience sampling technique. The sample size was 30. Self-structured knowledge questionnaire was used to assess the level of knowledge on NIPHA among BPT students. It consists of 20 multiple choice questionnaires. Questions (1-4) based on causative agent, (5, 6) based on prevalence, (7, 8) based on mode of transmission, (9, 10) based on risk factor, (11) based on incubation period (12, 13) based on signs & symptoms, (14, 15, 16 )based on diagnosis, (17) based on complication, (18) based on treatment.(19, 20) preventive aspects.
Each question has 4 choices, the correct response was scored as 1 and the wrong answer was zero.
To establish the reliability of the tool, a split half method was used. Correlation coefficient was found to be (r=0.85). Thus, the data was collected and entered into excel. The duration of data collection is 1 week. Ethical clearance was taken from institutional ethical committee board. The data was analyzed on the basis of objectives and hypothesis using descriptive and inferential statistics. The result was projected with appropriate tables and graphs.
Z value is 1.96 for 95% confidence inferential (1.645 for 90%)
Z=1.96(95% confidence level)
N= Z2 O2 / E2
= 1.962 * 52 / 22
If the allowance of 10% for missing, losses, to follow up, withdrawal is assumed the corrected sample will be 27 subjects
Hence the researcher takes 30 as the sample size to conduct this research.
Table 1 indicates the distribution of respondents by age where majority 16 (54%) belongs to the age group of 19-20 years, 12 (40%) were in 17-18 years,1 (3%) were in 21-22 years and 1 (3%) were in >23 years. Majority of the BPT students 25 (83%) were females and 5 (17%) were males. Majority of BPT students 14 (47%) of BPT students were Hindu, 12 (40%) were Muslim and 4 (13%) were Christians. Majority of the BPT students 28(93%) were unmarried and 2 (7%) were married. Majority of the BPT students 26 (87%) were belongs to nuclear family, 3 (10%) were in joint family and 1 (3%) belongs to conjoint family. Majority of the BPT students 30 (100%) had previous knowledge on NIPHA Virus. Majority of the BPT students 30(100%) had source of information through mass media.
Table 2 represents frequency and percentage distribution of respondents on knowledge level; in which majority 17(56%) of respondent had moderate knowledge, 13(44%) of respondent had inadequate knowledge level regarding NIPAH virus among BPT students, none of them having adequate knowledge.
Table 3 represents the mean, standard deviation. The mean is 9.033 with standard deviation 3.96
Table 4 shows the association of level of knowledge score with selected demographic variables. It is evident from this table, that there is no significant association with the variables like age, sex, religion, marital status, type of family previous knowledge, source of information on NIPAH virus.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The present study found that, the knowledge level among 30 respondents, 13(44%) had inadequate, 17(56%) had moderate, and 0(0%) had adequate knowledge. The mean value was 9.033 with the standard deviation of 3.96. Chi square was computed to find the association between the selected variables with the level of knowledge scores of BPT students on Nipah virus, which shows there is no association between selected demographic variables like age with computed χ2=1.22 at 3df, sex with computed X2=0.053 at 1df, religion with computed χ2=4.752 at 2df, marital status with computed X2= 0.0096 at 1df, type of family with computed X2= 1.360 at 2 df at p 0.05 level. The present study also reveals that there is no association between selected demographic variables like family income, type of family, previous knowledge in relation with the level of knowledge scores of BPT students at p 0.05 level.
A word of thanks can mean a lot if told in a right way. It is never just words but is a language of appreciation from one heart to other. Our efforts are fruitful because of the kindness showered on us by the supreme personality and our deep sense of gratitude to the Almighty for his blessing. We would like to express our gratitude to Dr Manjula S, Principal College of Nursing, Kannur Medical College for her support. We are also thankful to our vice principal Dr. Sathya Shenbagapriya for her guidance and support. We would like to extend our sincere gratitude towards Ms. Jayachithra Soundravalli, Subject in charge, Research Coordinator. We would like to convey sincere thanks to all our friends and our dear ones who have directly or indirectly help us in the successful completion of this study. They have made this endeavor possible through their love, patience and concern and which gave us confidence to achieve this goal.
1. Park K (2011) Preventive and Social Medicine. 21st ed. Jabalpur (India): Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers.
2. Kulkarni DD, Tosh C, Venkatesh G, Kumar SD (2013) Nipah virus infection: Current scenario. Indian J Virol 24: 398-408.
3. Binub K (2019) Medicose: Knowledge and attitude o nipah at Malapuram district, India. Int J Commun Med Publication Health 6: 784-788.
4. Polit DF (1996) Nursing research. 6th Edition, Philadelphia. Lippincott Publishers.
5. Aby DV, Geethu M, Srythy CSK, Anoop IB (2019) Awareness regarding Nipah infection among health-care workers in a Medical College Hospital in Kerala. J Curr Res Sci Med Medicine 5: 33-38.
- Journal of Cancer Science and Treatment (ISSN:2641-7472)
- BioMed Research Journal (ISSN:2578-8892)
- Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology Research (ISSN:2640-6136)
- Journal of Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis Research (ISSN: 2643-0541)
- Journal of Rheumatology Research (ISSN:2641-6999)
- Advance Research on Alzheimers and Parkinsons Disease
- Journal of Oral Health and Dentistry (ISSN:2638-499X)