Research Article
Adherence Predictors in Pregnant Women Living with HIV on Tenofovir Alafenamide and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
Ahizechukwu C Eke*
Corresponding Author: Ahizechukwu C Eke, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine & Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA.
Received: May 19, 2022; Revised: May 29, 2022; Accepted: June 01, 2022 Available Online: July 02, 2022
Citation: Eke AC. (2022) Adherence Predictors in Pregnant Women Living with HIV on Tenofovir Alafenamide and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate. J Pharm Drug Res, 5(3): 608-616.
Copyrights: ©2022 Eke AC. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Share :
  • 316

    Views & Citations
Background: Medication adherence to antiretroviral medications is critical during pregnancy in women living with HIV (WLHIV) for multiple reasons. In this study, we report medication adherence to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) during pregnancy in WLHIV.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women living with HIV aged 18-48 years who received either tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) during pregnancy. Medication adherence was assessed during each visit in all trimesters of pregnancy, and was self-reported. Demographics and outcomes were analyzed using standard statistical tests. Logistic regression analysis models accounting for potential confounders, with adjusted odds-ratios (aORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals were reported.

Results: One hundred women met inclusion criteria, with thirty-four women on TAF and sixty-six women on TDF. While medication adherence was higher in women using TAF compared to TDF, with 76% adherent to TDF vs 83% adherent to TAF; p=0.282, in the 1st trimester; 82% adherent to TDF vs 88% adherent to TAF; p=0.924, in the 2nd trimester, and 88% adherent to TDF vs 91% adherent to TAF; p=0.176, in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, these differences in medication adherence were not statistically significant. In the third trimester of pregnancy, multiparous women were more likely to be adherent to TDF/TAF antiretroviral medications compared to nulliparous women - univariable odds ratio, OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.12, 1.57; p<0.05; multivariable (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08, 1.52; p<0.05).

Conclusions: Pregnant women living with HIV on TDF and TAF achieved high adherence, but medication adherence was better in the third trimester compared to the first or second trimesters of pregnancy. These findings support the need to continually assess medication adherence during pregnancy.

Keywords: Medication adherence, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, Tenofovir Alafenamide, Antiretroviral drugs, HIV AIDS, Pregnancy

Abbreviations: 95% CI: Confidence Interval; **P values <0.05
INTRODUCTION

Human immunodeficiency infection during pregnancy continues to be a major cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity, especially in developing countries [1-3]. In 2020, approximately 1.3 million women living with HIV became pregnant, among which 85% (1.1 million) received antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [4]. Despite efforts to develop safe and effective HIV medications, pregnant and postpartum women remain one of the last groups (therapeutic orphans) to use newer HIV therapeutics, because drug development programs routinely exclude pregnant women [5]. Therefore, providing effective antiretroviral medications, efficiently, at the right doses, whilst measuring and supporting adherence and minimizing undesirable adverse effects, is essential to optimization efforts of antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy.

The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) as a safe and effective method for treatment of HIV infection in high-risk populations changed the trajectory of survival from HIV infection, as well as perinatal HIV infections. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are two commonly used nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for preventing perinatal transmission [6-9]. Tenofovir alafenamide is a newer tenofovir (TFV) prodrug that is increasingly being used by pregnant women living with HIV (WLHIV) [9,10]. TAF achieves very high levels of tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and approximately 90% lower plasma concentrations of TFV compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) [11,12]. The ability of TAF to selectively concentrate in leucocytes maximizes its antiviral efficacy and potency, making TAF more desirable when compared to TDF [12]. Several studies have compared the efficacy and safety of TDF to TAF in non-pregnant adults [13], but only very few epidemiologic studies of TAF use have been completed in pregnant women [6-9,14].

Medication adherence is a critical factor that impacts HIV progression during pregnancy [15,16]. While optimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy is crucial to preventing HIV perinatal transmission and viral resistance, sub-optimal adherence is common in pregnancy and the postpartum period [17,18]. Identifying pregnant and postpartum women at highest risk for poor adherence has become a major focus of current HIV research [19-21]. and therefore, optimizing adherence among pregnant women living with HIV is critically important for the health of both the mother and the child [22]. As many women living with HIV are currently receiving TAF-based antiretroviral therapy, it is important to understand adherence to TAF, and what factors may modify HIV progression in adherent and non-adherent pregnant women living with HIV, and if TAF/TDF adherence is modified by any of these factors.

To facilitate understanding of adherence to tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate during pregnancy and postpartum, we conducted a retrospective cohort study among pregnant women living with HIV.

METHODS
This medication adherence study was a retrospective cohort of pregnant women living with HIV managed at a single academic center - the Johns Hopkins Hospital antenatal HIV clinic during the periods that span from January 1st, 2015 and June 30th, 2020. The Johns Hopkins HIV antenatal outpatient clinic is the second largest provider of HIV/AIDS care during pregnancy in the state of Maryland, USA, and provides care to pregnant women living with HIV in the surrounding states of Virginia, West Virginia, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and Washington DC. Women met inclusion criteria if they were living with HIV, on a combination antiretroviral medication that included either a TDF or a TAF regimen, between the ages of 18 to 48 years of age, and greater than 5 weeks of gestation in the current pregnancy. Women were excluded if they were not living with HIV and not on a TDF or a TAF-based antiretroviral regimen. Over ninety-five percent of pregnant women living with HIV who attend the Johns Hopkins HIV in pregnancy antenatal clinic are on a TDF or a TAF containing regimen during pregnancy, and postpartum. Majority of pregnant women living with HIV were seen for their initial prenatal visit in the first trimester of pregnancy, and are continually seen until the time of delivery.

Definition of exposure and outcome
Pregnant women living with HIV using combination antiretroviral therapy containing either TDF or TAF, was the primary exposure of interest. We defined each individual's TAF or TDF adherence levels by trimesters of pregnancy (first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy). Combination antiretroviral therapy was defined as the combination of at least two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a protease inhibitor, as per the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommendations [9]. The date of combined antiretroviral therapy initiation (either before the onset of pregnancy or once pregnancy was diagnosed), was documented in individual charts. Medication adherence to either a TDF or a TAF regimen was our primary outcome of interest.

Covariates
For this study, several covariates of interest were measured at the beginning of pregnancy and at each trimester of pregnancy. Adherence was collected in two categories - optimal adherence (100%) and sub-optimal adherence (<100%), and therefore, we dichotomized adherence as such. Self-reported race was collected as: white non-Hispanic, white Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, black Hispanic, American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, other Hispanic and Other. Due to low numbers of racial ethnic group in our pregnant women, these categories were collapsed into two categories: Black and non-Blacks for the purpose of the analysis. For analysis purposes, parity was classified as nulliparous (no prior delivery), primiparous (one previous delivery), two previous deliveries, and or three or more previous deliveries). Maternal alcohol, heroin, cocaine, methadone, and tobacco use were collected as either used (yes) or no use (no) during pregnancy. Maternal comorbidities, including hypertensive disease in current pregnancy, gestational diabetes in current pregnancy, hepatitis B or C positive status, and women with history of prior preterm births were also extracted. Presence of these co-morbidities were recorded as ‘yes’ if present and ‘no’ if absent. Maternal HIV-RNA viral load and CD4 plasma levels were collected in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy. For the purposes of analyses, the number of mothers with HIV viral load
Statistical analysis
An assessment of normality of the data was done at the time of exploratory data analysis. Graphical and numerical methods, including the use of statistical tests, were used. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, as well as histograms, box plots, P-P plots and Q-Q plots were used to check our data for missing variables, assumptions, outliers and influential observations, and subsequently examined the relationships among explanatory covariates, and assess the direction and approximate size of relationships between explanatory and outcome covariates. TDF and TDF medication adherence, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were compared, and their frequencies determined between the exposure’s groups (TDF versus TAF) as prespecified. Categorical variables were reported as proportions, and continuous measures were reported as medians and interquartile ranges. Differences between groups were assessed with Fisher’s exact tests and Chi-square test for categorical variables (as appropriate), and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of medication adherence and its associated 95% confidence intervals, accounting for potential confounders of the association between TDF/TAF use and medication adherence. Statistical analyses were conducted in Stata, version 17.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX; 2021).

RESULTS
In the final cohort, sixty-six women received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) while thirty-four women received tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between women who were on TDF compared to those who were on a TAF-based regimen, except for maternal age and CD4 counts in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy (Table 1). Pregnant women living with HIV on a TDF regimen were older than those in the TAF arm (median age of 32 years (interquartile range, IQR (29-36) in the TDF group and 29 years (IQR 25-32) in the TAF group; p value= 0.045). On the contrary, women on TAF-based regimen were more likely than those on a TDF regimen to have a higher CD4 count (median 470 cells/mm3 (IQR 355-594) in the TDF arm versus 669 cells/mm3 (514-750); p=0.035) in the third trimester of pregnancy. The majority of participants were Blacks [54/66 (82 %) in the TDF group and 31/34 (91%) in the TAF group, p value= 0.214)].


Medication adherence in the 1st trimester (76% adherence to TDF versus 83% adherence to a TAF regimen; p=0.282), 2nd trimester (82% adherence to TDF versus 88% adherence to a TAF regimen; p=0.924), and 3rd trimesters (88% adherence to TDF versus 91% adherence to a TAF regimen; p=0.176) of pregnancy were higher in pregnant women living with HIV on TAF compared to those on TDF, but these differences in medication adherence were not statistically significant. Adherence to both medications increased from the first to the third trimesters of pregnancy (Table 1).

There were no significant differences between women on TDF and those on TAF with respect to maternal alcohol and cocaine use; heroin, methadone, and tobacco use; hypertension in pregnancy, preterm delivery, hepatitis B and C infections, and mode of delivery based on maternal viral load. Four women in the TDF arm (6%) were delivered by Cesarean for viral loads >1,000 copies/mL, while none was delivered in the TAF arm solely for a high viral load indication.

Table 2 shows the univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of the associations with medication adherence stratified by trimesters of pregnancy (first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy). In the univariable and multivariable analysis in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy, there were no statistically significant associations between medication adherence and TDF or TAF use, parity, race/ethnicity, cocaine, tobacco, marijuana, and heroin use (Table 2). In the third trimester of pregnancy, multiparous women (parity of >=2) were more likely to be adherent to antiretroviral medications compared to nulliparous women. This finding was statistically significant in both the univariable (odds ratio, OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.12, 1.57; p<0.05) and multivariable (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08, 1.52; p<0.05) analyses.


DISCUSSION
This retrospective cohort study found that medication adherence levels to TDF and TAF are overall, high in pregnant women living with HIV. Although medication adherence was higher for women using TAF when compared to compare to TDF, the differences in adherence were not statistically significant. In the third trimester of pregnancy, multiparous women were more likely to be adherent to TDF/TAF antiretroviral medications compared to nulliparous women, a statistically significant finding.

Nulliparity was identified as a risk factor for poor antiretroviral medication adherence in this study. While it can be difficult to explain why adherence was better in multiparous women in this cohort of pregnant women living with HIV, a possible explanation why multiparous women had better adherence in our study is that nulliparous pregnant women sometimes forget to take their medications, partly because, as their first pregnancy, nulliparous pregnant women might be scared of taking medications, or due to adverse effects of the medications compared to the more experienced multiparous women who would take medications more consistently in their prior pregnancies.

Changes in medication adherence can occur at any time during pregnancy [23,24]. Although medication adherence generally increases as pregnancy increases from the first to the third trimesters of pregnancy [23], adherence can be modified by a woman’s’ medication dosing regimen complexity, pill burden, social support systems, among other predisposing factors [25]. While many pregnant women are motivated to increase medication adherence during pregnancy, keep their disease under control, and reduce the chances of perinatal transmission of HIV, the proportion of women who are poorly adherent to medications during pregnancy, especially in the first trimester of pregnancy, do so for fear and anxiety of potential harm to the fetus [23]. In this study, adherence to HIV medications increased from the first to the third trimester of pregnancy, consistent with findings from other studies [23].
There remains a critical, unmet need for objective, quantitative measures of adherence to antiretroviral medications among women living with HIV [19]. Non-pharmacological adherence measures such as patient self-report, pillbox checks and counts of pill days, and electronic apps are limited by response bias, as participants can respond to questions about adherence inaccurately, incompletely, or falsely. In addition, these subjective methods do not measure adherence directly [26,27]. Multiple studies have examined tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP), the active form of tenofovir in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (the site of action) as an objective measure of cumulative adherence [19,28,29]. Data from the MTN 001 trial [30] demonstrated that TFV-DP concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) could be used as objective measures of adherence [30]. While plasma tenofovir (TFV) did not correlate well with medication adherence in the MTN 001 trial, measurement of TFV-DP in PBMCs was an authentic and valid process of assessing TFV adherence [30]. Other methods to assess medication adherence include use of dried blood spots [31,32] and maternal hair [33]. Although TFV-DP in dried blood spots (DBS) can be used to measure accumulated drug, they represent drug exposures over 4-6 weeks (hair) or 6-8 weeks (DBS) [34,35] and might not efficiently capture current adherence patterns in pregnant women given the rapidly changing physiology of pregnancy. So, objective methods of adherence assessment, while better than subjective methods of adherence have limitations as well.

This study had some limitations. First, is the strict method in which we classified adherence (<100% versus 100% adherence). There have been less strict ways to classify medication adherence in literature (as <95% versus ≥95%; <90% versus ≥90%; or <80% versus ≥80%). However, despite our strict method of classifying adherence, there were no TDF or TAF groups in the first, second or third trimesters of pregnancy that were less than 75% adherent in this study. A second limitation of this study is that the comparatively small sample size of the study did not allow for sub-group analyses. With an increased sample size, it may have been possible to show other statistically significant differences in medication adherence patterns between women who used TDF compared to those who used TAF during pregnancy. Finally, although women subjectively reported medication adherence, it was difficult to objectively ascertain adherence to TDF/TAF medications in this study. This is important because non-pharmacologic adherence measures have limitations and may overestimate or underestimate TDF or TAF adherence [9,19].

The strengths of this study include the comparatively high number of pregnant women living with HIV managed at this single center - much more than the numbers currently managed at several other centers within the United States and other developed countries. Finally, because TAF use was part of routine obstetric care at this institution, the results of this study may be more generalizable to many obstetric practices within and outside the United States.

CONCLUSION
Our results suggest that there are no differences in optimal adherence to TDF versus TAF based antiretroviral therapy in pregnant women living with HIV except for maternal parity. Utilizing objective methods of adherence are important, as objective methods of medication adherence are less prone to bias. Larger studies are required to describe intracellular PBMC TFV-DP concentrations, and establish TAF medication adherence benchmarks in pregnancy and postpartum in pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV.
  1. Eke AC, Dooley KE, Sheffield JS (2019) Pharmacologic Research in Pregnant Women - Time to Get It Right. New Eng J Med 380(14): 1293-1295.
  2. Eke AC, Olagunju A, Best BM, Mirochnick M, Momper JD, et al. (2020) Innovative Approaches for Pharmacology Studies in Pregnant and Lactating Women: A Viewpoint and Lessons from HIV. Clin Pharmacokinetics 59(10): 1185-1194.
  3. Eke AC, Olagunju A, Momper J, Penazzato M, Abrams Elaine J, et al. (2021) Optimizing Pharmacology Studies in Pregnant and Lactating Women Using Lessons From HIV: A Consensus Statement. Clin Pharmacol Ther 110(1): 36-48.
  4. HIV AIDS. Accessed (2021). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/hiv-aids
  5. Salama E, Eke AC, Best BM, Mirochnick M, Momper JD (2020) Pharmacokinetic Enhancement of HIV Antiretroviral Therapy During Pregnancy. J Clin Pharmacol 60(12): 1537-1550.
  6. Thimm MA, Livingston A, Ramroop R, Eke AC (2022) Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women with HIV on Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Compared to Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF). J AIDS HIV Treat 4(1): 6-13.
  7. Thimm MA, Eke AC (2021) Tenofovir, pregnancy and renal function changes in pregnant women living with HIV. AIDS (London, England) 35(8): 1319-1320.
  8. Eke AC, Shoji K, Best BM, Momper JD, Stek AM, et al. (2021) Population Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir in Pregnant and Postpartum Women Using Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65(3): e02168-20.
  9. Eke AC, Brooks KM, Gebreyohannes RD, Sheffield JS, Dooley KE, et al. (2020) Mirochnick M. Tenofovir alafenamide use in pregnant and lactating women living with HIV. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 16(4): 333-342.
  10. Chinula L, Brummel SS, Ziemba L, Stranix-Chibanda L, Coletti A, et al. (2020) Safety and efficacy of TAF vs TDF and DTG vs EFV in pregnancy: IMPAACT 2010 trial. presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, abstract 130LB; March 8-11, 2020 Boston, Massachusetts. Accessed on: April 11th, 2020. Available online at: http://www.croiconference.org/sessions/safety-and-efficacy-dtg-vs-efv-and-tdf-vs-taf-pregnancy-impaact-2010-trial
  11. Baxi SM, Scherzer R, Greenblatt RM, Minkoff H, Sharma A, et al. (2016) Higher tenofovir exposure is associated with longitudinal declines in kidney function in women living with HIV. AIDS (London, England) 30(4): 609-618.
  12. Podany AT, Bares SH, Havens J, Dyavar SR, Neill JO, et al. (2018) Plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of tenofovir in patients switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide. AIDS (London, England) 32(6): 761-765.
  13. Campbell L, Barbini B, Burling K, Cromarty Ben, Hamzah L, et al. (2021) Safety of Tenofovir Alafenamide in People With HIV Who Experienced Proximal Renal Tubulopathy on Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 88(2): 214-219.
  14. Lockman S, Brummel SS, Ziemba L, Chibanda LS, McCarthy K, et al. (2021) Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate HIV antiretroviral therapy regimens started in pregnancy (IMPAACT 2010/VESTED): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 397(10281): 1276-1292.
  15. Omonaiye O, Kusljic S, Nicholson P, Manias E (2018) Medication adherence in pregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus receiving antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 18(1): 805.
  16. Pellowski JA, Price DM, Harrison AD,Tuthill EL, Myer L, et al. (2019) A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Adherence Interventions for Women Living with HIV. AIDS Behav 23(8): 1998-2013.
  17. Nachega JB, Uthman OA, Anderson J, Peltzer K, Wampold S, et al. (2012) Adherence to antiretroviral therapy during and after pregnancy in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS (London, England) 26(16): 2039-2052.
  18. Haas AD, Msukwa MT, Egger M, Tenthani L, Tweya H, et al. (2016) Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy During and After Pregnancy: Cohort Study on Women Receiving Care in Malawi's Option B+ Program. Clin Infect Dis 63(9): 1227-1235.
  19. Castillo-Mancilla JR, Haberer JE (2018) Adherence Measurements in HIV: New Advancements in Pharmacologic Methods and Real-Time Monitoring. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 15(1): 49-59.
  20. Iacob SA, Iacob DG, Jugulete G (2017) Improving the Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy, a Difficult but Essential Task for a Successful HIV Treatment-Clinical Points of View and Practical Considerations. Front Pharmacol 8: 831.
  21. Zahedi-Spung L, Young M, Haddad LB, Badell ML (2018) Perceived Barriers to Antepartum HIV Medication Adherence in HIV Infected Pregnant Women. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2018: 4049212.
  22. Panel on Treatment of Pregnant Women with HIV Infection and Prevention of Perinatal Transmission. Recommendations for Use of Antiretroviral Drugs in Transmission in the United States. Accessed on: November 01, 2019. Available online at http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/PerinatalGL.pdf
  23. Matsui D (2012) Adherence with drug therapy in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Internat 2012: 796590.
  24. Adhikari K, Patten SB, Lee S, Metcalfe A (2019) Adherence to and Persistence with Antidepressant Medication during Pregnancy: Does It Differ by the Class of Antidepressant Medication Prescribed? Can J Psychiatry 64(3): 199-208.
  25. Ingersoll KS, Cohen J (2008) The impact of medication regimen factors on adherence to chronic treatment: A review of literature. J Behav Med 31(3): 213-224.
  26. Berg KM, Arnsten JH (1999) Practical and conceptual challenges in measuring antiretroviral adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 43 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S79-S87.
  27. Osterberg L, Blaschke T (2005) Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 353(5): 487-497.
  28. Hendrix CW, Andrade A, Bumpus NN, Kashuba AD, Marzinke MA, et al. (2016) Dose Frequency Ranging Pharmacokinetic Study of Tenofovir-Emtricitabine After Directly Observed Dosing in Healthy Volunteers to Establish Adherence Benchmarks (HPTN 066). AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 32(1): 32-43.
  29. Castillo-Mancilla JR, Zheng JH, Rower JE, Meditz A, Gardner EM, et al. (2013) Tenofovir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir diphosphate in dried blood spots for determining recent and cumulative drug exposure. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 29(2): 384-390.
  30. Hendrix CW, Chen BA, Guddera V, Hoesley C, Justman J, et al. (2013) MTN-001: Randomized pharmacokinetic cross-over study comparing tenofovir vaginal gel and oral tablets in vaginal tissue and other compartments. PloS One 8(1): e55013.
  31. Castillo-Mancilla JR, Searls K, Caraway P, Zheng JH, Gardner EM, et al. (2015) Short communication: Tenofovir diphosphate in dried blood spots as an objective measure of adherence in HIV-infected women. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 31(4): 428-432.
  32. Castillo-Mancilla JR, Morrow M, Coyle RP, Coleman SS, Gardner EM, et al. (2019) Tenofovir Diphosphate in Dried Blood Spots Is Strongly Associated With Viral Suppression in Individuals With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections. Clin Infect Dis 68(8): 1335-1342.
  33. Apornpong T, Grinsztejn B, Hughes M, Ritz J, Kerr SJ, et al. (2021) Antiretroviral hair levels, self-reported adherence, and virologic failure in second-line regimen patients in resource-limited settings. AIDS 35(9): 1439-1449.
  34. Brooks K, Pinilla M, Shapiro D (2019) Pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg with PK boosters during pregnancy and postpartum. Oral abstract presented at: 20th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV, Hepatitis, and Other Antiviral Drugs; 14-16 May 2019, Noordwijk, the Netherlands.
  35. Brooks KM, Anderson PL (2018) Pharmacologic-Based Methods of Adherence Assessment in HIV Prevention. Clin Pharmacol Ther 104(6): 1056-1059.